Change in Vaccine Protocol

  Download PDF with 2006 Vaccine Protocol Info

Cat vaccination info on the KITTY CORNER PAGE


I would like to make you aware that all 27 veterinary schools in North America are in the process of changing their protocols for vaccinating dogs and cats. Some of this information will present an ethical & economic challenge to vets, and there will be skeptics 

Some organizations have come up with a political compromise suggesting vaccinations every 3 years to appease those who fear loss of income vs. those concerned about potential side effects.
Politics, traditions, or the doctor's economic well being should not be a factor in medical decision.

NEW PRINCIPLES OF IMMUNOLOGY

"Dogs and cats immune systems mature fully at 6 months. If a modified live virus vaccine

 is given after 6 months of age, it produces an immunity which is good for the life of the pet (ie: canine distemper, parvo, feline distemper). If another MLV vaccine is given a year later, the antibodies from the first vaccine neutralize the antigens of the second vaccine and there is little or no effect. The titer is not "boosted" nor are more memory cells induced." Not only are annual boosters for parvo and distemper unnecessary, they subject the pet to potential risks of allergic reactions and immune-mediated hemolytic anemia. "There is no scientific documentation to back up label claims for annual administration of MLV vaccines." Puppies receive antibodies through their mothers milk. This natural protection can last 8-14 weeks.

Puppies & kittens should NOT be vaccinated at LESS than 8 weeks. Maternal immunity will neutralize the vaccine and little protection (0-38%) will be produced. Vaccination at 6 weeks will, however, delay the timing of the first highly effective vaccine. Vaccinations given 2 weeks apart suppress rather than stimulate the immune system. A series of vaccinations is given starting at 8 weeks and given 3-4 weeks apart up to 16 weeks of age. Another vaccination given sometime after 6 months of age (usually at 1 year 4 mo) will provide lifetime immunity.

CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DOGS

Distemper & Parvo

"According to Dr. Schultz, AVMA, 8-15-95, when a vaccinations series given at 2, 3 & 4 months and again at 1 year with a MLV, puppies and kitten program memory cells that survive for life, providing lifelong immunity." Dr. Carmichael at Cornell and Dr. Schultz have studies showing immunity against challenge at 2-10 years for canine distemper & 4 years for parvovirus. Studies for longer duration are pending. "There are no new strains of parvovirus as one mfg. would like to suggest. Parvovirus vaccination provides cross immunity for all types." Hepatitis (Adenovirus) is one of the agents known to be a cause of kennel cough. Only vaccines with CAV-2 should be used as CAV-1 vaccines carry the risk of "hepatitis blue-eye" reactions & kidney damage.

Bordetella Parainfluenza: Commonly called "Kennel cough" Recommended only for those dogs boarded, groomed, taken to dog shows, or for any reason housed where exposed to a lot of dogs. The intranasal vaccine provides more complete and more rapid onset of immunity with less chance of reaction. Immunity requires 72 hours and does not protect from every cause of kennel cough. Immunity is of short duration (4 to 6 months).

RABIES and LYME

There have been no reported cases of rabid dogs or cats in Harris, Montogomery or Ft. Bend Counties [Texas], there have been rabid skunks and bats so the potential exists. It is a killed vaccine and must be given every year. Rabies is requied in all states by law. Some states require it yearly, others every 3yrs. A live rabies shot is now know to give protection for at least 7yrs if not a lifetime. however the law is still requiring we all give our animals shots! If your state will accept a Rabies Titer you should opt to go that route. The longer you can go between redoing this this vaccine the better.

Lyme disease is a tick born disease which can cause lameness, kidney failure and heart disease in dogs. Ticks can also transmit the disease to humans. The original Ft. Dodge killed bacteria has proven to be the most effective vaccine. Lyme disease prevention should emphasize early removal of ticks. Amitraz collars are more effective than Top Spot, as amitraz paralyzes the tick's mouth parts preventing transmission of disease. However there are higher risks in using Amitraz collars (read here): http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?cls=0&articleid=1376

VACCINATIONS NOT RECOMMENDED

Multiple components in vaccines compete with each other for the immune system and result in lesser immunity for each individual disease as well as increasing the risk of a reaction.

Canine Corona Virus is only a disease of puppies. It is rare, self limiting (dogs get well in 3 days without treatment). Cornell &Texas A&M have only diagnosed one case each in the last 7 years. Corona virus does not cause disease in adult dogs.

Leptospirosis vaccine is a common cause of adverse reactions in dogs . Most of the clinical cases of lepto reported in dogs in the US are caused by serovaars (or types) grippotyphosa and bratsilvia.  The vaccines contain different serovaars eanicola and ictohemorrhagica. Cross protection is not provided and protection is short lived. Lepto vaccine is immuno-supressive to puppies less than 16 weeks.

NEW DEVELOPMENTS

Giardia is the most common intestinal parasite of humans in North America, 30% or more of all dogs & cats are infected with giardia. It has now been demonstrated that humans can transmit giardia to dogs & cats & vice versa.  Heartworm preventative must be given year round in Houston

VACCINES BADLY NEEDED

New vaccines in development include: Feline Immunodeficiency Virus and cat scratch   fever vaccine for cats and Ehrlichia [one of the other tick diseases, much worse than Lymes] for dogs.

THE VIEW FROM THE TRENCHES; BUSINESS ASPECTS

Most vets recommend annual boosters and most kennel operators require them. For years the pricing structure of vets has misled clients into thinking that the inherent value of an annual office visit was in the "shots" they failed to emphasize the importance of a physical exam for early detection of treatable diseases. It is my hope that you will continue to require rabies & Kennel cough and emphasize the importance of a recent vet exam. I also hope you will accept the new protocols and honor these pets as currently vaccinated. Those in the boarding business who will honor the new vaccine protocols can gain new customers who were turned away from vet owned boarding facilities reluctant to change.

CONCLUSION

Dogs & cats no longer need to be vaccinated against distemper, parvo, & feline leukemia

 every year . Once the initial series of puppy or kitten vaccinations and first annual vaccinations are completed, immunity from MLV vaccines persists for life. It has been shown that cats over 1 year of age are immune to Feline Leukemia whether they have been vaccinated or not. Imagine the money you will save, not to mention fewer risks from side effects. PCR rabies vaccine, because it is not adjuvanted, will mean less risk of mediated hemolytic anemia and allergic reactions are reduced by less frequent use of vaccines as well as by avoiding unnecessary vaccines such as K-9 Corona virus and chlamydia for cats, as well as ineffective vaccines such as Leptospirosis and FIP. Intranasal vaccine for Rhiotracheitis and Calici virus, two upper respiratory viruses of cats provide more complete protection than injectable vaccines with less risk of serious reactions.

The AAHA and all 27 veterinary schools of North America are our biggest endorsement for these new protocols.

Dr. Bob Rogers

Please consider as current on all vaccinations for boarding purposes

DOGS Initial series of puppy vaccines

1. distemper, hepatitis, parvo, parinfluenze - 3 sets one month apart concluding at 16 weeks of age.

2. Rabies at 16 weeks of age (later is better)

3. Bordetella within last 4-6 months.  First annual (usually at 1 year and 4 months of age)

1. DHP, Parvo, Rabies

2. Bordetella within last 4-6 months 2 years or older

1. Rabies with in last year

2. Bordetella within last 4-6 months

3. DHP & Parvo given anytime over 6 months of age , but not necessarily within the last year.

Recommended: Physical exam for transmissible diseases and health risks.

NEW RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CATS

Feline vaccine related Fibrosarcoma is a type of terminal cancer related in inflammation caused by rabies & leukemia vaccines . This cancer is thought to affect 1 in 10,000 cats vaccinated. Vaccines with aluminum adjuvant, an ingredient included to stimulate the immune system, have been implicated as a higher risk. We now recommend a non-adjuvanted rabies vaccine for cats . Testing by Dr. Macy, Colorado State, has shown this vaccine to have the lowest tissue reaction and although there is no guarantee that a vaccine induced sarcoma will not develop, the risk will be much lower than with other vaccines.

Program injectable 6 mo flea prevention for cats has been shown to be very tissue reactive & therefore has the potential of inducing an injection site fiborsarcoma. If your cat develops a lump at the site of a vaccination, we recommend that it be removed ASAP, within 3-12 weeks. Read this site for more: http://www.avma.org/vafstf/ownbroch.asp

 Feline Leukemia Virus Vaccine

This virus is the leading viral killer of cats. The individuals most at risk of infection are young outdoor cats, indoor/outdoor cats and cats exposed to such individuals. Indoor only cats with no exposure to potentially infected cats are unlikely to become infected. All cats should be tested prior to vaccination. Cats over one year of age are naturally immune to Fel.V whether they are vaccinated or not, so annual vaccination of adult cats is NOT necessary. The incubation period of Feline leukemia can be over 3 years, so if your cat is in the incubation state of the disease prior to vaccination, the vaccine will not prevent the disease.

Feline Panleukopenia Virus  Vaccine

Also called feline distemper is a highly contagious and deadly viral disease of kittens. It's extremely hardy and is resistant to extremes in temperature and to most available disinfectants.Although an effective treatment protocol is available, it is expensive to treat because of the serious nature of the disease and the continued presence of virus in the environment, vaccination is highly recommended for all kittens . Cats vaccinated at 6 month or older with either killed or MLV vaccine will produce an immunity good for life. Adult cats do NOT need this vaccine.

Feline Calicivirus/Herpesvirus Vaccine.

Responsible for 80-90% of infectious feline upper respiratory tract diseases. The currently available injectable vaccines will minimize the severity of upper respiratory infections, although none will prevent disease in all situations.  Intranasal vaccines are more effective at preventing the disease entirely. Don't worry about normal sneezing for a couple of days. Because intranasal vaccines produce an immunity of shorter durations, annual vaccination is recommended.

VACCINES NOT RECOMMENDED

Chlamydia or pneumonitis.

The vaccine produces on a short (2 month) duration of immunity and accounts for less than 5% of upper respiratory infections in cats. The risks outweigh the benefits.

Feline Infectious Peritonitis

A controversial vaccine. Most kittens that contract FIP become infected during the first 3 months of life. The vaccine is labeled for use at 16 weeks. All 27 vet schools do not recommend the vaccine.

Bordetella

A new vaccine for feline bordetella has been introduced. Dr. Wolfe of Texas A&M says that bordetella is a normal flora and does not cause disease in adult cats. Dr. Lappin of Colorado State says that a review of the Colorado State medical records reveals not one case diagnosed in 10 years. Bordetella is easily treated with antibiotics so it might be better just to skip this shot all together.

CATS Initial kitten series

1.  Distemper [PLP], Rhino Calicivirus, Feline Leukemia Vaccine - 3 sets given one month apart concluding at 16 weeks.

2. Rabies at 16 weeks First Annual [usually at 1 year and 4 months of age]

1. Distemper (PLP), Rhino Calicivirus, Rabies, 2  years or older

1. Rabies within the last year

2. Rhino Calicivirus within last year

3. Distemper and FelV given anytime after 6 months of age, but not necessarily with the last year.

    Recommended: Physical exam, FeLV/FIV testing, fecal exam for giardia

One Companion Animal A Day

"Save a life and you save the world." Talmud

"One companion animal at a time" Next-To-Kin sm

Wondering what you can do to improve the lives of companion animals and their guardians? Try to inform one person a day about the dangers of over-vaccination.

It's very easy. No one is a stranger when they have a dog or cat.

For example, you have a water leak in the house. Ask the maintenance manager or plumber who comes to fix the leak if he has a dog or cat.

Ask them: Do you vaccinate annually? Do you realize that's not necessary? Do you know that one in every 10 dogs and cats may suffer potentially serious side effects from vaccinations?

People - strangers, who then are no longer strangers - love to talk and care about their companion animals.

So try to help one companion animal a day by talking to one guardian a day. It will have a real impact - right away.
———————————————
Be Informed About Vaccine

"We have to change our focus from yearly vaccination to that of a yearly physical."
 

 

 

   

Before you give your pet any vaccines download this .PDF dated Apr 2009 with info you must know before you speak with your vets. Go ARMED!

 

VACCINES - DISCUSSIONS, PRESENTATIONS & REPORTS

Dangers of Vaccines  Jeffrey Levy DVM PCH


Adverse Vaccine Reactions.
W. Jean Dodds, DVM.
www.noble-leon.com
This article has been reproduced on this website with the permission of Dr. Dodds.

Avoiding Vaccine Reactions in Dogs and Cats.
Craig E. Greene.
28th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association: October 24 – 27, 2003: Bangkok, Tailand.
www.vin.com

Feline Postvaccinal Sarcoma: A 2004 Update.
Histovet Surgical Pathology.
www.histovet.com

Feline Vaccine-Associated Sarcomas.
Barbara E. Kitchell, DVM, PhD, DACVIM.
30 th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association: May 11 – 14, 2005: Mexico City, Mexico.
www.vin.com/proceedings

Infectious Disease Prevention Change is in the Wind.
Richard B. Ford, DVM, MS, DACVIM, DACVPM (Hon).
30 th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association: May 11 – 14, 2005: Mexico City, Mexico.
www.vin.com/proceedings

Injection Site and Vaccine Associated Sarcomas: New Advances for a New Millennium.
Gregory K. Ogilvie, DVM, DACVIM (Internal Medicine, Oncology).
29 th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association: October 6 – 9, 2004: Rhodes, Greece.
www.vin.com

Update on Feline Fibrosarcoma.
Patrick Devauchelle, DVM
27 WSAVA CONGRESS.
www.vin.com

Vaccination Protocols for Dogs Predisposed to Vaccine Reactions.
W. Jean Dodds, DVM
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.
May/June 2001, Vol. 37, Pages 211-214.
This article has been reproduced on this website with the permission of Dr. Dodds.
www.noble-leon.com

Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force: Roundtable Discussion - The current understanding and management of vaccine-associated sarcomas in cats.
JAVMA: June 1, 2005; Vol. 226, No. 11.
www.avma.org

Vaccine-associated feline sarcomas.
Wallace B. Morrison, DVM, MS, DACVIM; Robin M. Starr, DVM, MEd; and the Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force.
Report of the Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force from the Journal of the AVMA, Vol 218, No. 5, March 1, 2001, pp. 697-702.
www.avma.org

Vaccine-Associated Sarcomas in the Cat.
Glenna Mauldin.
World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress: 2001: Vancouver.
www.vin.comVACCINES - CASE STUDIES:

Clinical use of serum parvovirus and distemper virus antibody titers for determining revaccination strategies in healthy dogs.
Lisa Twark, DVM; W. Jean Dodds, DVM.
Hemopet and Antech Diagnostics, 17672A Cowan Ave, Irvine, CA 92614.
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
October 1, 2000, Vol. 217, No. 7, Pages 1021-1024.
avmajournals.avma.org

Do postvaccinal sarcomas occur in Australian cats?
G Burton and KV Mason.
Animal Skin and Allergy Clinic, 3331 Pacific Highway, Springwood, Queensland 4127.
Aust Vet J 1997; 75:102-106.
www.ava.com.au

Effects of vaccines on the canine immune system.
T R Phillips, J L Jensen, M J Rubino, W C Yang, and R D Schultz.
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706.
Can J Vet Res. 1989 April; 53(2): 154–160.
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov

Epidemiologic evidence for a causal relation between vaccination and fibrosarcoma tumorigenesis in cats.
Kass PH, Barnes WG Jr, Spangler WL, Chomel BB, Culbertson MR.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616-8735.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Aug 1;203(3):396-405.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Feline Vaccine-associated Fibrosarcoma: Morphologic Distinctions.
S. S. Couto, S. M. Griffey, P. C. Duarte and B. R. Madewell.
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA (SSC), and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology (SMG), Medicine and Epidemiology (PCD), and Surgical and Radiological Sciences (BRM), University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA.
Vet Pathol 39:33-41 (2002).
www.vetpathology.org

Fibrosarcomas at presumed sites of injection in dogs: characteristics and comparison with non-vaccination site fibrosarcomas and feline post-vaccinal fibrosarcomas.
Vascellari M, Melchiotti E, Bozza MA, Mutinelli F.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Histopathology Department, Viale dell'Universita 10, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy.
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003 Aug;50(6):286-91.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Histology and Immunohistochemistry of Seven Ferret Vaccination-site Fibrosarcomas.
J. S. Munday, N. L. Stedman and L. J. Richey.
Athens Diagnostic Laboratory and Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Vet Pathol 40:288-293 (2003).
www.vetpathology.org

Prognosis for presumed feline vaccine-associated sarcoma after excision: 61 cases (1986–1996).
Elizabeth Hershey, DVM; Karin U. Sorenmo, CMV, DACVIM; Mattie J. Hendrick, VMD, DACVP; Frances S. Shofer, PhD; David M. Vail, DVM, DACVIM.
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
January 1, 2000, Vol. 216, No. 1, Pages 58-61.
avmajournals.avma.org

Pulmonary and mediastinal metastases of vaccination-site sarcoma in a cat.
D. G. Rudmann, W. G. Van Alstine, F. Doddy, G. E. Sandusky, T. Barkdull and E. B. Janovitz.
Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Veterinary Pathology, Vol 33, Issue 4 466-469.
www.vetpathology.org

The potential role of inflammation in the development of postvaccinal sarcomas in cats.
Macy DW, Hendrick MJ.
School of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State College, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1996 Jan;26(1):103-9.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Vaccine-associated Rhabdomyosarcoma with Spinal Epidural Invasion and Pulmonary Metastasis in a Cat.
H.-W Chang, S.-Y Ho, H.-F Lo, Y.-C Tu, C.-R Jeng, C.-H Liu, F.-I Wang and V. F. Pang.
Vet Pathol 43:55-58 (2006).
www.vetpathology.org

Vaccine Site-Associated Sarcoma and Malignant Lymphoma in Cats: A Report of Six Cases (1997–2002).
Bruce R. Madewell, VMD, Diplomate ACVIM (Oncology Internal Medicine), Tracy L. Gieger, DVM, Diplomate ACVIM (Internal Medicine), Patricia A. Pesavento, DVM, PhD and Michael S. Kent, DVM, Diplomate ACVIM (Oncology).
From the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 40:47-50 (2004).
www.jaaha.org

MORE INFO AND STORIES

Have a new puppy?

 What should you do as far as puppy vaccines? Read this article. And more generally GREAT INFO for EVERYONE to read on what top pet experts have to say about vaccines.

WHY YOU SHOULD NOT DO YEARLY VACCINES from Shirley's Wellness Website

NBC NEWS - Yearly Vaccines NOT a good idea

Moolah's Story: What happened to the Standard of Excellence?

By Jim Schwartz, Founder of Next-To-Kin, man of dog

My first generation of companion animals were all named after great professional wrestlers. There was my silver Miniature Poodle, Buddy; named after Nature Boy, Buddy Rogers, the first dual National Wrestling Alliance/World Wide Wrestling Federation champion. There was Nicki, a Black Lab-Shepherd female who was named after Nick Bockwinkle, the American Wrestling Association champion; and there was Rickie, a female marked Maltese - all nine pounds of her - who was named after Ric Flair, the 16-time NWA/WWF champion.

Then there was my black Standard Poodle, Moolah, the Standard of Excellence. Moolah was named after Lillian Ellison, who wrestled as the Fabulous Moolah. Lillian is probably the greatest female wrestling champion known to date. For 27 years, she was the champ and she trained all the subsequent female wrestlers for many years. I picked Moolah from a litter of 11 puppies. She was such a fabulous dog that I named her "The Fabulous Moolah - The Standard of Excellence."

On October 29, 1999, I brought Moolah in for her annual rabies shot. At that time, I asked the vet, "Can we not do the three-year rabies vaccine - like we are doing the three-year parvo and distemper?"

"No," I was told. "Arapahoe County [Colorado] still requires the annual rabies vaccination."

Now Moolah, at the time, was not in the best of health to begin with. Secondly, she was 11 years of age. I would later learn that both of these are critical concerns. I would later learn that the rabies-vaccine label typically states "only administer to healthy dogs." I would later learn that the research is pretty overwhelming that older dogs do not need the vaccination - especially if they are kept in a confined area and out of the woods.

However, at that time, I was not aware of those points. Nor was I aware that Colorado had passed, in January of 1999, a bill allowing the three-year rabies vaccination - or that it had been enacted into law in July of 1999, four months prior to Moolah's shot.

Moolah developed autoimmune illness.

Every guardian knows his or her dog. Moolah wasn't herself. Normally upon my calling, she would be up instantly. Now she wasn't. Moolah always ate very well. (Once she got into my Werther's Original gold-wrapped butterscotch candies, devouring them. When I looked for them and accused her, she gave me a "who me?" look even as the wrappers dangled like tinsel from her ears). Now she wasn't eating well, either.

Moolah was always at my side. Now, she was in the cool hallway - panting and panting and panting. Her gums became pale. Her blood platelet counts dropped like a rock; Oxyglobin was used, special medication requiring me to wear gloves. Her platelets continued to drop. Her dosages of the steroid prednisone were increased.

She still wasn't eating -- not even Good Times hamburgers with cheese.

I was advised to leave her at the vet's for a 24-hour watch. It went on for days; I visited her several times daily. The last day she looked at me as if to say, "Take me home to die." I didn't. I can still see her face as she went back into the cage.

Then came the call: "You ought to come down."

Five-six-seven thousand dollars later - all to no avail - she could hardly get up; she could hardly breathe. Hearing my voice when I entered, for the first and last time that day, she raised her head.

It was time. I had promised my late-friend Fred Burke to do what he had done: "I bring them into my life," he said, "I will be the one that takes them out."

I sang to Moolah and held her. The vet sedated her. I kept my promise to Fred Burke.

Sadly, The Fabulous Moolah's case is not isolated. It unfortunately happens every day.

The vet that I liked left the clinic that I was not happy with to join a new clinic. So, this is early in the year 2000, February or March. It was time for shots for Ellie-or to look into shots for Ellie-my black, female Standard Poodle, and I asked the vet about the annual rabies vaccination.

"No, we can do a three-year vaccination," she said.

I asked, "Did that just occur?"

The doctor replied, "No. I mean, we've had it since 1999."

Well, that was interesting to me. So, I called the vet clinic that had given Moolah her shot, talked with the manager, and asked, "Do you still do the annual vaccination?"

She replied, "Yes."

I asked, "Is it still required by Arapahoe County?"

She said, "Yes, Arapahoe County requires it."

I was convinced that Arapahoe County was at fault. Why would I think otherwise? Why would the vets mislead me? So I inquired at Arapahoe County Animal Control and eventually learned that they were not at fault. As a matter of fact, they had notified everyone of the change in the rabies vaccination law. Additionally, I learned that the vaccination period was not set by county ordinance but by state law.

Subsequently, I learned of a study in Europe indicating that 7 to 12 percent of all vaccinated companion animals experience adverse reactions within the first 45 days, including death and autoimmune illness. The 1-in-10,000 and 1-in-100,000 adverse reaction statistics, thrown around by some veterinarians, have not been validated scientifically and are based on reactions reported by veterinarians themselves. That's sort of like Dracula guarding the blood bank. There is no real good data on these adverse reactions that I am aware of, other than that European study.

Based upon all of this information a list of questions was developed and submitted to the veterinary firm (part of a national chain) that had given Moolah the fatal shot. They wouldn't respond to the questions, but they sent the questionnaire on to the veterinary group's Southwest Regional medical director, Dr. Rocky McKelvey. He wrote back that the issue of annual vaccinations is a controversial subject, that it's based on local regulation, and that this national chain of more than 100 free-standing animal hospitals has chosen to practice "conservative medicine" and recommend annual rabies vaccination.

Then on September 1, 2001, the American Veterinary Medical Association issued "Principles of Vaccination" that state that the practice of annual rabies vaccination is based on historical precedent and government regulation not scientific data. And that's the basis for the practice of conservative medicine?

This brings up the real question: Who can you trust? Moolah's rabies shot did not come from a rogue vet or as a random act. The practice of annual vaccinations by this large group of freestanding vet hospitals continued in 2001, according to Dr. Rocky McKelvey. Moolah has passed on and there is no bringing her back. I realize this. Why do I tell Moolah's story? Because what happened to Moolah need not, and should not, happen to another dog. Unfortunately, since December 28, 1999, annual shots bearing potentially deadly side effects have been issued to thousands of dogs and cats knowingly, willingly, systemically by economically motivated "professionals."

Who can you trust? Guardians must ask about alternatives to annual rabies vaccinations because, obviously, the vets are not informing them. Not when the cost of the rabies vaccine to the vets is 61 cents per shot and they sell it to guardians for from $15 to $38 along with a $35 office exam. Are vets in professional practices or are they in transaction-based practices - no different than commissioned salespersons? There are many, many, many veterinary practices that thrive and have done wonderfully - as illustrated in their own vet magazines - without being dependent upon transaction-based shots.

Why has this annual-rabies-shot practice gone on for 20-plus years? I can connect the dots only one way, and it draws a picture of economics.

I was financial planner of the year in 1985. I founded the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors, the largest fee-only organization. I've written a book on financial planning that's gone into two editions. It's been critically acclaimed and 10 years later has been called one of the few classics in the business. I pioneered no-load insurance in this country and authored or have been mentioned in hundreds of different articles during my time. Had I not had this background, I doubt that I would have put two and two together.

Maybe this is not how the dots are connected. But in light of the vaccination protocols of all of the major vet schools, in light of the American Animal Hospital Association saying three-year vaccinations, in light of the law changes, any vet - any vet - who continues to practice a vaccination protocol of annual rabies shots, without providing guardians with the opportunity for informed consent, in my opinion, is guilty of malpractice and silent, deadly, animal cruelty.

I can't bring the Fabulous Moolah back. But I can carry on her legacy by applying her Standard of Excellence to the veterinary profession and, hopefully, save millions of dogs and cats from death and suffering, and save their guardians from the suffering and the cost.

And thus, we established Next-To-Kin, for The Fabulous Moolah - The Standard of Excellence, and for your fabulous canine companions.

 

 

 

    

  Check out this website & book

STOP THE SHOTS.COM

 

Is Your Pet Dying From Over-Vaccination Due to Vet Economics? (courtesy of vaccinenews.com)

Nationally and internationally, companion animals (pets) are being over-vaccinated - a practice that is resulting in vaccine related deaths, severe illnesses, reduced longevity and large monetary costs to guardians (pet owners).

The most common practice is the annual administration of rabies vaccine, based upon the oft-stated supposition that an annual booster is necessary to maintain the vaccine's effectiveness. In reality, there is no research substantiating that practice, and veterinary schools and professional associations increasingly are embracing a triennial administration standard.

A study of more than 1,000 cats and 1,000 dogs in the United Kingdom by Canine Health Concern in March 2001 showed a 1 in 10 risk of adverse reaction from vaccines! The study, which tracked over a seven-month period the health of cats and dogs vaccinated by one UK veterinarian, found that 7.54% to 12.42% of the dogs had adverse reactions within a 45-day period post-vaccination. An almost-identical number of cats - from 7.56% to 12.44% -- also suffered adverse reactions within 45 days. This is quite contradictory to the vaccine-manufacturers' claim that less than 15 adverse reactions occur out of 100,000 companion animals vaccinated. The UK study results were reported at the 99% confidence level. Vaccine manufacturers rely on adverse-reaction statistics from the vets themselves.

In our opinion many vets continue to cling to the annual rabies shot has less to do with a cautious standard of care and more to do with their economic dependence on vaccinations for fiscal solvency. This is especially true of a substantial - if not vast - majority of small vet practices (1-3 people, non-specialty, non-emergency practice).

A vial of rabies vaccine costs the veterinarian about 61 cents and is typically administered at a cost to the guardian of from $15 to $38 - not including the $35 office visit. In perspective, an 18-oz. package of Kellogg's Sugar Frosted Flakes® is $2.20 to the grocer and approximately $2.75 retail. If the grocer's mark-up were comparable to that of rabies vaccine, Frosted Flakes would cost $137 without the office visit and more than $260 with it. To borrow Tony the Tiger's expression, that size of a mark-up is "Gr-r-reat!"

Take out 1 year of rabies vaccination and the consequential office visit-- just for dogs -- and the average small-practice vet's income drops from approximately $87,000 to $25,000 -- and this doesn't include cats or other vaccinations!

The Veterinarian "Shot-based Practice" Model is a systemically flawed economic approach and potentially detrimental to companion animals. Bad practice-management becomes bad medicine, resulting in unnecessary -- and widespread -- death, illness, reduced longevity of companion animals and unnecessary cost to owners.

Shot Based Practice Analysis

The vast majority of dog owners vaccinate yearly. There is an arguably safer choice --the three year rabies vaccination option -- but many, many in the veterinarian community are not informing the guardians (pet owners) to the potential detriment of their animal companions’ (pets’) life, health, and longevity.

Could economics be a factor in this lethargic effort on the part of many vets to provide their clients with an opportunity for informed consent?

Yearly rabies vaccination is big business and materially impacts the small-animal vet practice!

We can make these assumptions based upon various surveys and studies printed by animal association groups and trade associations.

· Average vet has 2,500 dogs and cats (45% dogs).

· Cost of vial of rabies vaccine is 61 cents.

· Cost of inoculation is between $15 and $38 yearly not including office visit.

· Cost of office visit is approximately $35.

· Price markup on rabies vaccine: 2400% to 6200% and again, this does not include the office visit.

If 100% of the dogs in the average one-vet practice are annually given the rabies vaccine= 2,500*.45 (dogs per practice) or 1,125 dogs.

The gross operating profit (after cost of goods, 61cents per shot) equals:

@$15 per shot, a net of $14.39 = $16,189.

@$38 per shot, a net of $37.39 = $42,064.

If the three year option is exercised (versus a yearly vaccination for rabies), then each vet loses between $32,000 ($16,000 x 2 years) and $84,000 ($42,000 x 2 years) of operating profit in each three-year vaccination period.

Adding office visits (1 a year for 2 years x 1,125 dogs x $35 per visit) = $78,800 of potential lost revenue.

(Note: The guardian should see that his/her companion animal receives a wellness exam at least yearly, which would extinguish this loss.)

Now, consider these figures. The:

· Median number of transactions per vet per year in 1997 was 5,102.

· Median gross income per vet in 1997 was $305,000 for a one- person practice.

· Net-income median for a one-vet practice before owner's compensation as a percentage of gross income was 26.8%. Assuming $305,000, that would be$87,300 for the average 1-vet practice.

· Average transaction charge is $58.41 per vet in a one-vet operation.

 If 1,125 transactions for rabies vaccine would be lost here is the impact on the one-vet practice for the two years the dog doesn't get a rabies vaccine (assuming no replacement revenue).

· Transactions go from 5,102 to 3,887 or a 22% decline.

· Gross income falls (at $20 per shot plus $35 for an office visit) by $62,000 from $305,000 to $243,000.

· Net median-income per vet in a one-vet situation could drop from $87,000 to $25,000 or by 71%!

And this is only if dogs were inoculated for rabies on a three-year cycle. The impact magnifies with cats going three years on the shot.

Source: "Financial and Productivity Pulsepoints: Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Performance Benchmarks:Vital Statistics For Your Veterinary Practice," published by the American Animal Hospital Association, 1998.

The Small Vet (Non-emergency, non-specialist) Shot Model's Systemic Dependence on Transactions Assumptions:

- That a $25 rabies shot is eliminated for 1,000 dogs only in one year. (Cats are not considered and parvo virus and distemper shots would still be administered annually).

- Profit on the shot is $24.39 (the cost being 61 cents).

- 26% is the net profit margin.

Result: Instead of 1,000 transactions (shots) yielding $24,390, the vet would have to gross $93,807 from other areas of the practice to replace that net revenue. Furthermore, using a $54 average per transaction, the vet would have to conduct 70% more transactions - 1,737 instead of 1,000 - which would mean a 15% increase in workload (the average vet has 5,100 transactions annually) just to be at the same place. Then consider the loss of office-visit revenue and take out cats, and parvo and distemper annually, and the Small Vet Shot Model indicates red ink.

It appears that even at 20% of the gross revenue, rabies shots may constitute 100% of the net profits - or even worse, subsidize a net-deficit practice - of average small-vet practices. The loss of two years of shots, on which these practices seem dependent, would have a devastating economic impact if not replaced.

It appears that the small-vet economic model is a "shot model," based economically - by design or by evolution - on transactions rather than expertise. Such a model needs to be reexamined for validity of purpose and economic consequences.

· Vaccine-related cancer in cats: According to Colorado State University Professor Dennis Macey, "the incidence of this often fatal cancer (sarcoma-cancer development at the vaccine site) has been documented by several studies to be 1 to 3.2 per 10,000 cats receiving a rabies vaccine Š If all the cats in Denver (estimated to be 400,000) were to be vaccinated yearly for rabies, the unneeded additional vaccinations would result in an additional 26 to 84 vaccine cancer sites per year! Š I estimate 22,000 vaccine-associated tumors per year. Since surgery is usually unsuccessful, radiation treatment is necessary. Treating all these cats would cost $66 million per year."

-- "Are We Vaccinating Too Much," Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 1995

· And this doesn't even consider vaccine related prolonged illness or vaccine compounded deaths or reduced longevity for cats - and doesn't consider the impact on dogs at all!

Mere Property or Next-To-Kin?

How much money would it take to persuade you to give up your television set? $3,000? What's that? You say you have a 53" high-definition projection TV that costs more that $3,000? Okay, would you give it up for $30,000?

Well, the pet food manufacturer, Iams Co., a division of Proctor & Gamble, commissioned a Gallup poll, which found that 66% of the respondents would not trade their dog or cat for $1,000,000! (Dog Fancy, May 2002 issue)

Here are some more facts to chew on:

•An annual American Animal Hospital Survey found that 83% of companion-animal guardians (dog and cat owners) "were somewhat likely … likely … or very likely" to risk their life for their companion animal; 70% said they would spend $1,000 on treatment for a life-threatening illness or accident; 40% would spend any amount necessary.

•Two other studies found that between 44% and 76% of companion animals sleep in their person's bed.

• Midland National Life Insurance Company gives a discount on life insurance for senior citizens who have a dog, as it has been shown that dogs reduce stress (high blood pressure), routine visits to the doctor and, accordingly, medical expenses.

•In a study by Dr. Karen Allen, assistance dogs were able to substitute for paid-human assistance to the elderly or physically challenged in 68% of activities, saving a net-$13,000 a year in costs.

"Dogs aren't my whole life, but they make my life whole," wrote the late Roger A. Caras, noted broadcaster, writer and editor.

Yet, our laws still classify companion animals (domesticated non-farm animals) as "mere property." In Great Britain dogs and cats are considered sentient beings.

Constructively, we are moving to recognize domesticated non-farm animals as beyond mere property in law. Several states now allow dogs and cats effectively to be heirs – via trusts set up for their care after the primary guardian has passed away.

It is time to declare companion animals (dogs and cats) to be "beyond mere property" and recognize that they are not mere objects. The value of the animal-human bond, and the companionship generated by that bond, should be legally recognized beyond the depreciated value of the cat or dog. This is not "whack-o animal rights" but simple protection both for the companion animal and for the guardian.

By recognizing the value of companion animals to be "beyond mere property, Next-To-Kin," the law could establish significant civil economic penalties for the loss of that companionship through cruelty – be it of the gut-wrenching variety or the silent, systemic, willful acts of over-vaccination by smiling veterinarians. What else would one call economically driven acts that result in unnecessary suffering, illness, reduced healthy life span, and death?

As long as these $1,000,000 companion animals are legally considered mere property, there are no deterrents to over-vaccination and other types of self-serving, non-informed consent activities.