|
Change in Vaccine Protocol
Download PDF with 2006 Vaccine
Protocol Info
Cat vaccination info on the
KITTY CORNER PAGE
I would like to make you aware that all 27 veterinary schools in
North America are in the process of changing their protocols for
vaccinating dogs and cats. Some of this information will present
an ethical & economic challenge to vets, and there will be
skeptics
Some organizations have come up with a
political compromise suggesting vaccinations every 3 years to
appease those who fear loss of income vs. those concerned about
potential side effects.
Politics, traditions, or the doctor's economic well being should
not be a factor in medical decision.
NEW PRINCIPLES OF IMMUNOLOGY
"Dogs and cats immune systems mature fully at
6 months. If a modified live virus vaccine
is given after 6 months of age, it produces
an immunity which is good for the life of the pet (ie: canine
distemper, parvo, feline distemper). If another MLV vaccine is
given a year later, the antibodies from the first vaccine
neutralize the antigens of the second vaccine and there is little
or no effect. The titer is not "boosted" nor are more memory cells
induced." Not only are annual boosters for parvo and distemper
unnecessary, they subject the pet to potential risks of allergic
reactions and immune-mediated hemolytic anemia. "There is no
scientific documentation to back up label claims for annual
administration of MLV vaccines." Puppies receive antibodies
through their mothers milk. This natural protection can last 8-14
weeks.
Puppies & kittens should NOT be vaccinated at
LESS than 8 weeks. Maternal immunity will neutralize the vaccine
and little protection (0-38%) will be produced. Vaccination at 6
weeks will, however, delay the timing of the first highly
effective vaccine. Vaccinations given 2 weeks apart suppress
rather than stimulate the immune system. A series of vaccinations
is given starting at 8 weeks and given 3-4 weeks apart up to 16
weeks of age. Another vaccination given sometime after 6 months of
age (usually at 1 year 4 mo) will provide lifetime immunity.
CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DOGS
Distemper & Parvo
"According to Dr. Schultz, AVMA, 8-15-95,
when a vaccinations series given at 2, 3 & 4 months and again at 1
year with a MLV, puppies and kitten program memory cells that
survive for life, providing lifelong immunity." Dr. Carmichael at
Cornell and Dr. Schultz have studies showing immunity against
challenge at 2-10 years for canine distemper & 4 years for
parvovirus. Studies for longer duration are pending. "There are no
new strains of parvovirus as one mfg. would like to suggest.
Parvovirus vaccination provides cross immunity for all types."
Hepatitis (Adenovirus) is one of the agents known to be a cause of
kennel cough. Only vaccines with CAV-2 should be used as CAV-1
vaccines carry the risk of "hepatitis blue-eye" reactions & kidney
damage.
Bordetella Parainfluenza: Commonly called
"Kennel cough" Recommended only for those dogs boarded, groomed,
taken to dog shows, or for any reason housed where exposed to a
lot of dogs. The intranasal vaccine provides more complete and
more rapid onset of immunity with less chance of reaction.
Immunity requires 72 hours and does not protect from every cause
of kennel cough. Immunity is of short duration (4 to 6 months).
RABIES and LYME
There have been no reported cases of rabid
dogs or cats in Harris, Montogomery or Ft. Bend Counties [Texas],
there have been rabid skunks and bats so the potential exists. It
is a killed vaccine and must be given every year. Rabies is
requied in all states by law. Some states require it yearly,
others every 3yrs. A live rabies shot is now know to give
protection for at least 7yrs if not a lifetime. however the law is
still requiring we all give our animals shots! If your state will
accept a Rabies Titer you should opt to go that route. The longer
you can go between redoing this this vaccine the better.
Lyme disease is a tick born disease which can
cause lameness, kidney failure and heart disease in dogs. Ticks
can also transmit the disease to humans. The original Ft. Dodge
killed bacteria has proven to be the most effective vaccine. Lyme
disease prevention should emphasize early removal of ticks.
Amitraz collars are more effective than Top Spot, as amitraz
paralyzes the tick's mouth parts preventing transmission of
disease. However there are higher risks in using Amitraz collars
(read here): http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?cls=0&articleid=1376
VACCINATIONS NOT RECOMMENDED
Multiple components in vaccines compete with
each other for the immune system and result in lesser immunity for
each individual disease as well as increasing the risk of a
reaction.
Canine Corona Virus is only a disease of
puppies. It is rare, self limiting (dogs get well in 3 days
without treatment). Cornell &Texas A&M have only diagnosed one
case each in the last 7 years. Corona virus does not cause disease
in adult dogs.
Leptospirosis vaccine is a common cause of
adverse reactions in dogs . Most of the clinical cases of lepto
reported in dogs in the US are caused by serovaars (or types)
grippotyphosa and bratsilvia. The vaccines contain different
serovaars eanicola and ictohemorrhagica. Cross protection is not
provided and protection is short lived. Lepto vaccine is
immuno-supressive to puppies less than 16 weeks.
NEW DEVELOPMENTS
Giardia is the most common intestinal
parasite of humans in North America, 30% or more of all dogs &
cats are infected with giardia. It has now been demonstrated that
humans can transmit giardia to dogs & cats & vice versa.
Heartworm preventative must be given year round in Houston
VACCINES BADLY NEEDED
New vaccines in development include: Feline
Immunodeficiency Virus and cat scratch fever vaccine for cats
and Ehrlichia [one of the other tick diseases, much worse than
Lymes] for dogs.
THE VIEW FROM THE TRENCHES; BUSINESS
ASPECTS
Most vets recommend annual boosters and most
kennel operators require them. For years the pricing structure of
vets has misled clients into thinking that the inherent value of
an annual office visit was in the "shots" they failed to emphasize
the importance of a physical exam for early detection of treatable
diseases. It is my hope that you will continue to require rabies &
Kennel cough and emphasize the importance of a recent vet exam. I
also hope you will accept the new protocols and honor these pets
as currently vaccinated. Those in the boarding business who will
honor the new vaccine protocols can gain new customers who were
turned away from vet owned boarding facilities reluctant to
change.
CONCLUSION
Dogs & cats no longer need to be vaccinated
against distemper, parvo, & feline leukemia
every year . Once the initial series of
puppy or kitten vaccinations and first annual vaccinations are
completed, immunity from MLV vaccines persists for life. It has
been shown that cats over 1 year of age are immune to Feline
Leukemia whether they have been vaccinated or not. Imagine the
money you will save, not to mention fewer risks from side effects.
PCR rabies vaccine, because it is not adjuvanted, will mean less
risk of mediated hemolytic anemia and allergic reactions are
reduced by less frequent use of vaccines as well as by avoiding
unnecessary vaccines such as K-9 Corona virus and chlamydia for
cats, as well as ineffective vaccines such as Leptospirosis and
FIP. Intranasal vaccine for Rhiotracheitis and Calici virus, two
upper respiratory viruses of cats provide more complete protection
than injectable vaccines with less risk of serious reactions.
The AAHA and all 27 veterinary schools of
North America are our biggest endorsement for these new protocols.
Dr. Bob Rogers
Please consider as current on all
vaccinations for boarding purposes
DOGS Initial series of puppy vaccines
1. distemper, hepatitis, parvo, parinfluenze
- 3 sets one month apart concluding at 16 weeks of age.
2. Rabies at 16 weeks of age (later is
better)
3. Bordetella within last 4-6 months. First
annual (usually at 1 year and 4 months of age)
1. DHP, Parvo, Rabies
2. Bordetella within last 4-6 months 2 years
or older
1. Rabies with in last year
2. Bordetella within last 4-6 months
3. DHP & Parvo given anytime over 6 months of
age , but not necessarily within the last year.
Recommended: Physical exam for transmissible
diseases and health risks.
NEW RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CATS
Feline vaccine related Fibrosarcoma is a type
of terminal cancer related in inflammation caused by rabies &
leukemia vaccines . This cancer is thought to affect 1 in 10,000
cats vaccinated. Vaccines with aluminum adjuvant, an ingredient
included to stimulate the immune system, have been implicated as a
higher risk. We now recommend a non-adjuvanted rabies vaccine for
cats . Testing by Dr. Macy, Colorado State, has shown this vaccine
to have the lowest tissue reaction and although there is no
guarantee that a vaccine induced sarcoma will not develop, the
risk will be much lower than with other vaccines.
Program injectable 6 mo flea prevention for
cats has been shown to be very tissue reactive & therefore has the
potential of inducing an injection site fiborsarcoma. If your cat
develops a lump at the site of a vaccination, we recommend that it
be removed ASAP, within 3-12 weeks. Read this site for more:
http://www.avma.org/vafstf/ownbroch.asp
Feline Leukemia Virus Vaccine
This virus is the leading viral killer of
cats. The individuals most at risk of infection are young outdoor
cats, indoor/outdoor cats and cats exposed to such individuals.
Indoor only cats with no exposure to potentially infected cats are
unlikely to become infected. All cats should be tested prior to
vaccination. Cats over one year of age are naturally immune to
Fel.V whether they are vaccinated or not, so annual vaccination of
adult cats is NOT necessary. The incubation period of Feline
leukemia can be over 3 years, so if your cat is in the incubation
state of the disease prior to vaccination, the vaccine will not
prevent the disease.
Feline Panleukopenia Virus Vaccine
Also called feline distemper is a highly
contagious and deadly viral disease of kittens. It's extremely
hardy and is resistant to extremes in temperature and to most
available disinfectants.Although an effective treatment protocol
is available, it is expensive to treat because of the serious
nature of the disease and the continued presence of virus in the
environment, vaccination is highly recommended for all kittens .
Cats vaccinated at 6 month or older with either killed or MLV
vaccine will produce an immunity good for life. Adult cats do NOT
need this vaccine.
Feline Calicivirus/Herpesvirus Vaccine.
Responsible for 80-90% of infectious feline
upper respiratory tract diseases. The currently available
injectable vaccines will minimize the severity of upper
respiratory infections, although none will prevent disease in all
situations. Intranasal vaccines are more effective at preventing
the disease entirely. Don't worry about normal sneezing for a
couple of days. Because intranasal vaccines produce an immunity of
shorter durations, annual vaccination is recommended.
VACCINES NOT RECOMMENDED
Chlamydia or pneumonitis.
The vaccine produces on a short (2 month)
duration of immunity and accounts for less than 5% of upper
respiratory infections in cats. The risks outweigh the benefits.
Feline Infectious Peritonitis
A controversial vaccine. Most kittens that
contract FIP become infected during the first 3 months of life.
The vaccine is labeled for use at 16 weeks. All 27 vet schools do
not recommend the vaccine.
Bordetella
A new vaccine for feline bordetella has been
introduced. Dr. Wolfe of Texas A&M says that bordetella is a
normal flora and does not cause disease in adult cats. Dr. Lappin
of Colorado State says that a review of the Colorado State medical
records reveals not one case diagnosed in 10 years. Bordetella is
easily treated with antibiotics so it might be better just to skip
this shot all together.
CATS Initial kitten series
1. Distemper [PLP], Rhino Calicivirus,
Feline Leukemia Vaccine - 3 sets given one month apart concluding
at 16 weeks.
2. Rabies at 16 weeks First Annual [usually
at 1 year and 4 months of age]
1. Distemper (PLP), Rhino Calicivirus,
Rabies, 2 years or older
1. Rabies within the last year
2. Rhino Calicivirus within last year
3. Distemper and FelV given anytime after 6
months of age, but not necessarily with the last year.
Recommended: Physical exam, FeLV/FIV
testing, fecal exam for giardia |
|
One Companion Animal A Day
"Save a life and you save the world." Talmud
"One companion animal at a time" Next-To-Kin sm
Wondering what you can do to improve the lives of companion
animals and their guardians? Try to inform one person a day about
the dangers of over-vaccination.
It's very easy. No one is a stranger when they have a dog or cat.
For example, you have a water leak in the house. Ask the
maintenance manager or plumber who comes to fix the leak if he has
a dog or cat.
Ask them: Do you vaccinate annually? Do you realize that's not
necessary? Do you know that one in every 10 dogs and cats may
suffer potentially serious side effects from vaccinations?
People - strangers, who then are no longer strangers - love to
talk and care about their companion animals.
So try to help one companion animal a day by talking to one
guardian a day. It will have a real impact - right away.
———————————————
Be Informed About Vaccine
"We have to change our focus from yearly vaccination to that of a
yearly physical."
|
|
|
|
Before you give your
pet any vaccines
download this
.PDF dated Apr 2009 with info
you must know before you speak with your vets. Go ARMED! |
VACCINES - DISCUSSIONS, PRESENTATIONS & REPORTS
Dangers of Vaccines
Jeffrey
Levy DVM PCH

Adverse Vaccine Reactions.
W. Jean Dodds, DVM.
www.noble-leon.com
This article has been reproduced on this website with the permission of Dr.
Dodds.

Avoiding Vaccine Reactions in Dogs and Cats.
Craig E. Greene.
28th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association:
October 24 – 27, 2003: Bangkok, Tailand.
www.vin.com

Feline Postvaccinal Sarcoma: A 2004 Update.
Histovet Surgical Pathology.
www.histovet.com

Feline Vaccine-Associated Sarcomas.
Barbara E. Kitchell, DVM, PhD, DACVIM.
30 th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association: May
11 – 14, 2005: Mexico City, Mexico.
www.vin.com/proceedings

Infectious Disease Prevention Change is in the Wind.
Richard B. Ford, DVM, MS, DACVIM, DACVPM (Hon).
30 th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association: May
11 – 14, 2005: Mexico City, Mexico.
www.vin.com/proceedings

Injection Site and Vaccine Associated Sarcomas: New Advances for a
New Millennium.
Gregory K. Ogilvie, DVM, DACVIM (Internal Medicine, Oncology).
29 th World Congress of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association:
October 6 – 9, 2004: Rhodes, Greece.
www.vin.com

Update on Feline Fibrosarcoma.
Patrick Devauchelle, DVM
27 WSAVA CONGRESS.
www.vin.com

Vaccination Protocols for Dogs Predisposed to Vaccine Reactions.
W. Jean Dodds, DVM
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association.
May/June 2001, Vol. 37, Pages 211-214.
This article has been reproduced on this website with the permission of Dr.
Dodds.
www.noble-leon.com

Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force: Roundtable Discussion
- The current understanding and management of vaccine-associated sarcomas in
cats.
JAVMA: June 1, 2005; Vol. 226, No. 11.
www.avma.org

Vaccine-associated feline sarcomas.
Wallace B. Morrison, DVM, MS, DACVIM; Robin M. Starr, DVM, MEd; and the
Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force.
Report of the Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force from the Journal
of the AVMA, Vol 218, No. 5, March 1, 2001, pp. 697-702.
www.avma.org

Vaccine-Associated Sarcomas in the Cat.
Glenna Mauldin.
World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress: 2001: Vancouver.
www.vin.comVACCINES - CASE STUDIES:
Clinical use of serum parvovirus and distemper virus antibody titers
for determining revaccination strategies in healthy dogs.
Lisa Twark, DVM; W. Jean Dodds, DVM.
Hemopet and Antech Diagnostics, 17672A Cowan Ave, Irvine, CA 92614.
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
October 1, 2000, Vol. 217, No. 7, Pages 1021-1024.
avmajournals.avma.org

Do postvaccinal sarcomas occur in Australian cats?
G Burton and KV Mason.
Animal Skin and Allergy Clinic, 3331 Pacific Highway, Springwood, Queensland
4127.
Aust Vet J 1997; 75:102-106.
www.ava.com.au

Effects of vaccines on the canine immune system.
T R Phillips, J L Jensen, M J Rubino, W C Yang, and R D Schultz.
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine,
University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706.
Can J Vet Res. 1989 April; 53(2): 154–160.
www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov

Epidemiologic evidence for a causal relation between vaccination and
fibrosarcoma tumorigenesis in cats.
Kass PH, Barnes WG Jr, Spangler WL, Chomel BB, Culbertson MR.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Veterinary
Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616-8735.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Aug 1;203(3):396-405.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Feline Vaccine-associated Fibrosarcoma: Morphologic Distinctions.
S. S. Couto, S. M. Griffey, P. C. Duarte and B. R. Madewell.
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, School of
Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA (SSC), and Department of Pathology,
Microbiology and Immunology (SMG), Medicine and Epidemiology (PCD), and
Surgical and Radiological Sciences (BRM), University of California, School
of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA.
Vet Pathol 39:33-41 (2002).
www.vetpathology.org

Fibrosarcomas at presumed sites of injection in dogs:
characteristics and comparison with non-vaccination site fibrosarcomas and
feline post-vaccinal fibrosarcomas.
Vascellari M, Melchiotti E, Bozza MA, Mutinelli F.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Histopathology
Department, Viale dell'Universita 10, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy.
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003 Aug;50(6):286-91.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Histology and Immunohistochemistry of Seven Ferret Vaccination-site
Fibrosarcomas.
J. S. Munday, N. L. Stedman and L. J. Richey.
Athens Diagnostic Laboratory and Department of Veterinary Pathology, College
of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Vet Pathol 40:288-293 (2003).
www.vetpathology.org

Prognosis for presumed feline vaccine-associated sarcoma after
excision: 61 cases (1986–1996).
Elizabeth Hershey, DVM; Karin U. Sorenmo, CMV, DACVIM; Mattie J. Hendrick,
VMD, DACVP; Frances S. Shofer, PhD; David M. Vail, DVM, DACVIM.
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
January 1, 2000, Vol. 216, No. 1, Pages 58-61.
avmajournals.avma.org

Pulmonary and mediastinal metastases of vaccination-site sarcoma in
a cat.
D. G. Rudmann, W. G. Van Alstine, F. Doddy, G. E. Sandusky, T. Barkdull and
E. B. Janovitz.
Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Veterinary Pathology, Vol 33, Issue 4 466-469.
www.vetpathology.org

The potential role of inflammation in the development of
postvaccinal sarcomas in cats.
Macy DW, Hendrick MJ.
School of Veterinary Medicine, Colorado State College, Fort Collins 80523,
USA.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1996 Jan;26(1):103-9.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Vaccine-associated Rhabdomyosarcoma with Spinal Epidural Invasion
and Pulmonary Metastasis in a Cat.
H.-W Chang, S.-Y Ho, H.-F Lo, Y.-C Tu, C.-R Jeng, C.-H Liu, F.-I Wang and V.
F. Pang.
Vet Pathol 43:55-58 (2006).
www.vetpathology.org

Vaccine Site-Associated Sarcoma and Malignant Lymphoma in Cats: A
Report of Six Cases (1997–2002).
Bruce R. Madewell, VMD, Diplomate ACVIM (Oncology Internal Medicine), Tracy
L. Gieger, DVM, Diplomate ACVIM (Internal Medicine), Patricia A. Pesavento,
DVM, PhD and Michael S. Kent, DVM, Diplomate ACVIM (Oncology).
From the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary
Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 40:47-50 (2004).
www.jaaha.org
MORE
INFO AND STORIES
Have a new puppy?
What should you do as far as puppy vaccines?
Read this article. And more generally GREAT INFO for EVERYONE to read
on what top pet experts have to say about vaccines.
WHY YOU SHOULD NOT DO YEARLY VACCINES from
Shirley's Wellness Website
NBC NEWS - Yearly Vaccines NOT a good idea
|
Moolah's
Story: What happened to the Standard of Excellence?
By Jim
Schwartz, Founder of Next-To-Kin, man of dog
My first
generation of companion animals were all named after great
professional wrestlers. There was my silver Miniature Poodle,
Buddy; named after Nature Boy, Buddy Rogers, the first dual
National Wrestling Alliance/World Wide Wrestling Federation
champion. There was Nicki, a Black Lab-Shepherd female who was
named after Nick Bockwinkle, the American Wrestling Association
champion; and there was Rickie, a female marked Maltese - all nine
pounds of her - who was named after Ric Flair, the 16-time NWA/WWF
champion.
Then there was
my black Standard Poodle, Moolah, the Standard of Excellence.
Moolah was named after Lillian Ellison, who wrestled as the
Fabulous Moolah. Lillian is probably the greatest female wrestling
champion known to date. For 27 years, she was the champ and she
trained all the subsequent female wrestlers for many years. I
picked Moolah from a litter of 11 puppies. She was such a fabulous
dog that I named her "The Fabulous Moolah - The Standard of
Excellence."
On October 29,
1999, I brought Moolah in for her annual rabies shot. At that
time, I asked the vet, "Can we not do the three-year rabies
vaccine - like we are doing the three-year parvo and distemper?"
"No," I was
told. "Arapahoe County [Colorado] still requires the annual rabies
vaccination."
Now Moolah, at
the time, was not in the best of health to begin with. Secondly,
she was 11 years of age. I would later learn that both of these
are critical concerns. I would later learn that the rabies-vaccine
label typically states "only administer to healthy dogs." I would
later learn that the research is pretty overwhelming that older
dogs do not need the vaccination - especially if they are kept in
a confined area and out of the woods.
However, at
that time, I was not aware of those points. Nor was I aware that
Colorado had passed, in January of 1999, a bill allowing the
three-year rabies vaccination - or that it had been enacted into
law in July of 1999, four months prior to Moolah's shot.
Moolah
developed autoimmune illness.
Every guardian
knows his or her dog. Moolah wasn't herself. Normally upon my
calling, she would be up instantly. Now she wasn't. Moolah always
ate very well. (Once she got into my Werther's Original
gold-wrapped butterscotch candies, devouring them. When I looked
for them and accused her, she gave me a "who me?" look even as the
wrappers dangled like tinsel from her ears). Now she wasn't eating
well, either.
Moolah was
always at my side. Now, she was in the cool hallway - panting and
panting and panting. Her gums became pale. Her blood platelet
counts dropped like a rock; Oxyglobin was used, special medication
requiring me to wear gloves. Her platelets continued to drop. Her
dosages of the steroid prednisone were increased.
She still
wasn't eating -- not even Good Times hamburgers with cheese.
I was advised
to leave her at the vet's for a 24-hour watch. It went on for
days; I visited her several times daily. The last day she looked
at me as if to say, "Take me home to die." I didn't. I can still
see her face as she went back into the cage.
Then came the
call: "You ought to come down."
Five-six-seven
thousand dollars later - all to no avail - she could hardly get
up; she could hardly breathe. Hearing my voice when I entered, for
the first and last time that day, she raised her head.
It was time. I
had promised my late-friend Fred Burke to do what he had done: "I
bring them into my life," he said, "I will be the one that takes
them out."
I sang to
Moolah and held her. The vet sedated her. I kept my promise to
Fred Burke.
Sadly, The
Fabulous Moolah's case is not isolated. It unfortunately happens
every day.
The vet that I
liked left the clinic that I was not happy with to join a new
clinic. So, this is early in the year 2000, February or March. It
was time for shots for Ellie-or to look into shots for Ellie-my
black, female Standard Poodle, and I asked the vet about the
annual rabies vaccination.
"No, we can do
a three-year vaccination," she said.
I asked, "Did
that just occur?"
The doctor
replied, "No. I mean, we've had it since 1999."
Well, that was
interesting to me. So, I called the vet clinic that had given
Moolah her shot, talked with the manager, and asked, "Do you still
do the annual vaccination?"
She replied,
"Yes."
I asked, "Is it
still required by Arapahoe County?"
She said, "Yes,
Arapahoe County requires it."
I was convinced
that Arapahoe County was at fault. Why would I think otherwise?
Why would the vets mislead me? So I inquired at Arapahoe County
Animal Control and eventually learned that they were not at fault.
As a matter of fact, they had notified everyone of the change in
the rabies vaccination law. Additionally, I learned that the
vaccination period was not set by county ordinance but by state
law.
Subsequently, I
learned of a study in Europe indicating that 7 to 12 percent of
all vaccinated companion animals experience adverse reactions
within the first 45 days, including death and autoimmune illness.
The 1-in-10,000 and 1-in-100,000 adverse reaction statistics,
thrown around by some veterinarians, have not been validated
scientifically and are based on reactions reported by
veterinarians themselves. That's sort of like Dracula guarding the
blood bank. There is no real good data on these adverse reactions
that I am aware of, other than that European study.
Based upon all
of this information a list of questions was developed and
submitted to the veterinary firm (part of a national chain) that
had given Moolah the fatal shot. They wouldn't respond to the
questions, but they sent the questionnaire on to the veterinary
group's Southwest Regional medical director, Dr. Rocky McKelvey.
He wrote back that the issue of annual vaccinations is a
controversial subject, that it's based on local regulation, and
that this national chain of more than 100 free-standing animal
hospitals has chosen to practice "conservative medicine" and
recommend annual rabies vaccination.
Then on
September 1, 2001, the American Veterinary Medical Association
issued "Principles of Vaccination" that state that the practice of
annual rabies vaccination is based on historical precedent and
government regulation not scientific data. And that's the basis
for the practice of conservative medicine?
This brings up
the real question: Who can you trust? Moolah's rabies shot did not
come from a rogue vet or as a random act. The practice of annual
vaccinations by this large group of freestanding vet hospitals
continued in 2001, according to Dr. Rocky McKelvey. Moolah has
passed on and there is no bringing her back. I realize this. Why
do I tell Moolah's story? Because what happened to Moolah need
not, and should not, happen to another dog. Unfortunately, since
December 28, 1999, annual shots bearing potentially deadly side
effects have been issued to thousands of dogs and cats knowingly,
willingly, systemically by economically motivated "professionals."
Who can you
trust? Guardians must ask about alternatives to annual rabies
vaccinations because, obviously, the vets are not informing them.
Not when the cost of the rabies vaccine to the vets is 61 cents
per shot and they sell it to guardians for from $15 to $38 along
with a $35 office exam. Are vets in professional practices or are
they in transaction-based practices - no different than
commissioned salespersons? There are many, many, many veterinary
practices that thrive and have done wonderfully - as illustrated
in their own vet magazines - without being dependent upon
transaction-based shots.
Why has this
annual-rabies-shot practice gone on for 20-plus years? I can
connect the dots only one way, and it draws a picture of
economics.
I was financial
planner of the year in 1985. I founded the National Association of
Personal Financial Advisors, the largest fee-only organization.
I've written a book on financial planning that's gone into two
editions. It's been critically acclaimed and 10 years later has
been called one of the few classics in the business. I pioneered
no-load insurance in this country and authored or have been
mentioned in hundreds of different articles during my time. Had I
not had this background, I doubt that I would have put two and two
together.
Maybe this is
not how the dots are connected. But in light of the vaccination
protocols of all of the major vet schools, in light of the
American Animal Hospital Association saying three-year
vaccinations, in light of the law changes, any vet - any vet - who
continues to practice a vaccination protocol of annual rabies
shots, without providing guardians with the opportunity for
informed consent, in my opinion, is guilty of malpractice and
silent, deadly, animal cruelty.
I can't bring
the Fabulous Moolah back. But I can carry on her legacy by
applying her Standard of Excellence to the veterinary profession
and, hopefully, save millions of dogs and cats from death and
suffering, and save their guardians from the suffering and the
cost.
And thus, we
established Next-To-Kin, for The Fabulous Moolah - The Standard of
Excellence, and for your fabulous canine companions.
|
 |
|
|
Check out this website & book
STOP THE SHOTS.COM |
|
Is Your
Pet Dying From Over-Vaccination Due to Vet Economics?
(courtesy of
vaccinenews.com)
Nationally
and internationally, companion animals (pets) are being
over-vaccinated - a practice that is resulting in vaccine
related deaths, severe illnesses, reduced longevity and large
monetary costs to guardians (pet owners).
The most
common practice is the annual administration of rabies
vaccine, based upon the oft-stated supposition that an annual
booster is necessary to maintain the vaccine's effectiveness.
In reality, there is no research substantiating that practice,
and veterinary schools and professional associations
increasingly are embracing a triennial administration
standard.
A study of
more than 1,000 cats and 1,000 dogs in the United Kingdom by
Canine Health Concern in March 2001 showed a 1 in 10 risk of
adverse reaction from vaccines! The study, which tracked over
a seven-month period the health of cats and dogs vaccinated by
one UK veterinarian, found that 7.54% to 12.42% of the dogs
had adverse reactions within a 45-day period post-vaccination.
An almost-identical number of cats - from 7.56% to 12.44% --
also suffered adverse reactions within 45 days. This is quite
contradictory to the vaccine-manufacturers' claim that less
than 15 adverse reactions occur out of 100,000 companion
animals vaccinated. The UK study results were reported at the
99% confidence level. Vaccine manufacturers rely on
adverse-reaction statistics from the vets themselves.
In our
opinion many vets continue to cling to the annual rabies shot
has less to do with a cautious standard of care and more to do
with their economic dependence on vaccinations for fiscal
solvency. This is especially true of a substantial - if not
vast - majority of small vet practices (1-3 people,
non-specialty, non-emergency practice).
A vial of
rabies vaccine costs the veterinarian about 61 cents and is
typically administered at a cost to the guardian of from $15
to $38 - not including the $35 office visit. In perspective,
an 18-oz. package of Kellogg's Sugar Frosted Flakes® is $2.20
to the grocer and approximately $2.75 retail. If the grocer's
mark-up were comparable to that of rabies vaccine, Frosted
Flakes would cost $137 without the office visit and more than
$260 with it. To borrow Tony the Tiger's expression, that size
of a mark-up is "Gr-r-reat!"
Take out 1
year of rabies vaccination and the consequential office
visit-- just for dogs -- and the average small-practice vet's
income drops from approximately $87,000 to $25,000 -- and this
doesn't include cats or other vaccinations!
The
Veterinarian "Shot-based Practice" Model is a systemically
flawed economic approach and potentially detrimental to
companion animals. Bad practice-management becomes bad
medicine, resulting in unnecessary -- and widespread -- death,
illness, reduced longevity of companion animals and
unnecessary cost to owners.
Shot Based
Practice Analysis
The vast
majority of dog owners vaccinate yearly. There is an arguably
safer choice --the three year rabies vaccination option -- but
many, many in the veterinarian community are not informing the
guardians (pet owners) to the potential detriment of their
animal companions’ (pets’) life, health, and longevity.
Could
economics be a factor in this lethargic effort on the part of
many vets to provide their clients with an opportunity for
informed consent?
Yearly
rabies vaccination is big business and materially impacts the
small-animal vet practice!
We can make
these assumptions based upon various surveys and studies
printed by animal association groups and trade associations.
· Average
vet has 2,500 dogs and cats (45% dogs).
· Cost of
vial of rabies vaccine is 61 cents.
· Cost of
inoculation is between $15 and $38 yearly not including office
visit.
· Cost of
office visit is approximately $35.
· Price
markup on rabies vaccine: 2400% to 6200% and again, this does
not include the office visit.
If 100% of
the dogs in the average one-vet practice are annually given
the rabies vaccine= 2,500*.45 (dogs per practice) or 1,125
dogs.
The gross
operating profit (after cost of goods, 61cents per shot)
equals:
@$15 per
shot, a net of $14.39 = $16,189.
@$38 per
shot, a net of $37.39 = $42,064.
If the
three year option is exercised (versus a yearly vaccination
for rabies), then each vet loses between $32,000 ($16,000 x 2
years) and $84,000 ($42,000 x 2 years) of operating profit in
each three-year vaccination period.
Adding
office visits (1 a year for 2 years x 1,125 dogs x $35 per
visit) = $78,800 of potential lost revenue.
(Note: The
guardian should see that his/her companion animal receives a
wellness exam at least yearly, which would extinguish this
loss.)
Now,
consider these figures. The:
· Median
number of transactions per vet per year in 1997 was 5,102.
· Median
gross income per vet in 1997 was $305,000 for a one- person
practice.
·
Net-income median for a one-vet practice before owner's
compensation as a percentage of gross income was 26.8%.
Assuming $305,000, that would be$87,300 for the average 1-vet
practice.
· Average
transaction charge is $58.41 per vet in a one-vet operation.
If
1,125 transactions for rabies vaccine would be lost here is
the impact on the one-vet practice for the two years the dog
doesn't get a rabies vaccine (assuming no replacement
revenue).
·
Transactions go from 5,102 to 3,887 or a 22% decline.
· Gross
income falls (at $20 per shot plus $35 for an office visit) by
$62,000 from $305,000 to $243,000.
· Net
median-income per vet in a one-vet situation could drop from
$87,000 to $25,000 or by 71%!
And this is
only if dogs were inoculated for rabies on a three-year cycle.
The impact magnifies with cats going three years on the shot.
Source:
"Financial and Productivity Pulsepoints: Comprehensive Survey
and Analysis of Performance Benchmarks:Vital Statistics For
Your Veterinary Practice," published by the American Animal
Hospital Association, 1998.
The Small
Vet (Non-emergency, non-specialist) Shot Model's Systemic
Dependence on Transactions Assumptions:
- That a
$25 rabies shot is eliminated for 1,000 dogs only in one year.
(Cats are not considered and parvo virus and distemper shots
would still be administered annually).
- Profit on
the shot is $24.39 (the cost being 61 cents).
- 26% is
the net profit margin.
Result:
Instead of 1,000 transactions (shots) yielding $24,390, the
vet would have to gross $93,807 from other areas of the
practice to replace that net revenue. Furthermore, using a $54
average per transaction, the vet would have to conduct 70%
more transactions - 1,737 instead of 1,000 - which would mean
a 15% increase in workload (the average vet has 5,100
transactions annually) just to be at the same place. Then
consider the loss of office-visit revenue and take out cats,
and parvo and distemper annually, and the Small Vet Shot Model
indicates red ink.
It appears
that even at 20% of the gross revenue, rabies shots may
constitute 100% of the net profits - or even worse, subsidize
a net-deficit practice - of average small-vet practices. The
loss of two years of shots, on which these practices seem
dependent, would have a devastating economic impact if not
replaced.
It appears
that the small-vet economic model is a "shot model," based
economically - by design or by evolution - on transactions
rather than expertise. Such a model needs to be reexamined for
validity of purpose and economic consequences.
·
Vaccine-related cancer in cats: According to Colorado State
University Professor Dennis Macey, "the incidence of this
often fatal cancer (sarcoma-cancer development at the vaccine
site) has been documented by several studies to be 1 to 3.2
per 10,000 cats receiving a rabies vaccine Š If all the cats
in Denver (estimated to be 400,000) were to be vaccinated
yearly for rabies, the unneeded additional vaccinations would
result in an additional 26 to 84 vaccine cancer sites per
year! Š I estimate 22,000 vaccine-associated tumors per year.
Since surgery is usually unsuccessful, radiation treatment is
necessary. Treating all these cats would cost $66 million per
year."
-- "Are We
Vaccinating Too Much," Journal of the American Veterinary
Medical Association, 1995
· And this
doesn't even consider vaccine related prolonged illness or
vaccine compounded deaths or reduced longevity for cats - and
doesn't consider the impact on dogs at all!
Mere
Property or Next-To-Kin?
How much
money would it take to persuade you to give up your television
set? $3,000? What's that? You say you have a 53"
high-definition projection TV that costs more that $3,000?
Okay, would you give it up for $30,000?
Well, the
pet food manufacturer, Iams Co., a division of Proctor &
Gamble, commissioned a Gallup poll, which found that 66% of
the respondents would not trade their dog or cat for
$1,000,000! (Dog Fancy, May 2002 issue)
Here are
some more facts to chew on:
•An annual
American Animal Hospital Survey found that 83% of
companion-animal guardians (dog and cat owners) "were somewhat
likely … likely … or very likely" to risk their life for their
companion animal; 70% said they would spend $1,000 on
treatment for a life-threatening illness or accident; 40%
would spend any amount necessary.
•Two other
studies found that between 44% and 76% of companion animals
sleep in their person's bed.
• Midland
National Life Insurance Company gives a discount on life
insurance for senior citizens who have a dog, as it has been
shown that dogs reduce stress (high blood pressure), routine
visits to the doctor and, accordingly, medical expenses.
•In a study
by Dr. Karen Allen, assistance dogs were able to substitute
for paid-human assistance to the elderly or physically
challenged in 68% of activities, saving a net-$13,000 a year
in costs.
"Dogs
aren't my whole life, but they make my life whole," wrote the
late Roger A. Caras, noted broadcaster, writer and editor.
Yet, our
laws still classify companion animals (domesticated non-farm
animals) as "mere property." In Great Britain dogs and cats
are considered sentient beings.
Constructively, we are moving to recognize domesticated
non-farm animals as beyond mere property in law. Several
states now allow dogs and cats effectively to be heirs – via
trusts set up for their care after the primary guardian has
passed away.
It is time
to declare companion animals (dogs and cats) to be "beyond
mere property" and recognize that they are not mere objects.
The value of the animal-human bond, and the companionship
generated by that bond, should be legally recognized beyond
the depreciated value of the cat or dog. This is not "whack-o
animal rights" but simple protection both for the companion
animal and for the guardian.
By
recognizing the value of companion animals to be "beyond mere
property, Next-To-Kin," the law could establish significant
civil economic penalties for the loss of that companionship
through cruelty – be it of the gut-wrenching variety or the
silent, systemic, willful acts of over-vaccination by smiling
veterinarians. What else would one call economically driven
acts that result in unnecessary suffering, illness, reduced
healthy life span, and death?
As long as
these $1,000,000 companion animals are legally considered mere
property, there are no deterrents to over-vaccination and
other types of self-serving, non-informed consent activities.
|
|
|